By James Chapman
|
[caption
David Cameron hinted for the first time yesterday that Jeremy Hunt will face a Government inquiry into his relationship with News International.
The Prime Minister had ruled out an investigation, but as pressure builds on the Culture Secretary to resign, Mr Cameron has warned Mr Hunt he may yet order a Whitehall probe.
A spokesman for the Conservative leader said yesterday: 'If there is anything that suggests there has been a breach of the code the Prime Minister would of course act'.
The news follows reports Lord Justice Leveson is powerless to decide whether Mr Hunt broke the Ministerial Code.
If true, the claim - made by sources close to the Leveson Inquiry - would be a heavy blow to No 10âs hopes that Mr Hunt could be spared a potentially damaging separate and independent inquiry into his handling of an attempted takeover of BSkyB.
A Leveson Inquiry source said: âThe simple fact is he is not the arbiter of the ministerial code on discipline, whatever anybody else is saying. There is somebody else who has that role.
'The responsibility for investigating ministerial behaviour rests with Alex Allan, it is not a responsibility for Lord Justice Leveson. We want to be clear on that.â
Damaging emails between one of Mr Huntâs special advisers, Adam Smith, and a Rupert Murdoch lobbyist, which have emerged at the Leveson Inquiry, have left the Culture Secretary clinging to his job.
Most seriously, the messages suggest market-sensitive information was given to Mr Murdochâs empire on Mr Huntâs intentions regarding its proposed £8billion takeover of BSkyB before Parliament was informed
Mr Hunt has pleaded to be allowed to give evidence to the Leveson Inquiry earlier than planned, but his request appears to have fallen on deaf ears, meaning uncertainty over his political future will drag on for weeks if not months.
Enlarge ÂYesterday, three senior Liberal Democrats insisted Mr Cameron should reconsider his decision not to order a separate probe.
Lib Dem deputy leader Simon Hughes said: âWhat I cannot understand is why the matter of the ministerial code of conduct, which is to do with, âDo you take responsibility for your special adviser?â, is not something the Prime Minister should immediately refer to the person who has been given the job of doing that, Sir Alex Allan.â
Getting on with it: PM David Cameron has so far resisted an inquiry and left a school in his constituency today with cup cakes the children made for him
He was backed by the chairman of the Lib Dem parliamentary party, Lorely Burt, and Lib Dem peer Lord Oakeshott.
The chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, Sir Christopher Kelly, added to the pressure as he suggested Sir Alex was the âobviousâ person to conduct an investigation.
âIt is important for public confidence in the integrity of government... that this is done â" and done reasonably quickly,â he said.
But Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg rejected calls for a separate inquiry into Mr Huntâs conduct, suggesting that it would lead to âcrossed wiresâ.
âLetâs get to the bottom of what happened and what didnât happen by hearing what Jeremy Hunt has to say before Lord Leveson,â Mr Clegg said.
And a senior Government source said: âLord Justice Leveson isnât judging the Ministerial Code, we know that.
âBut if Jeremy Hunt on oath canât confirm that he didnât know specifics on what Adam Smith was passing back and forth, then heâs done for.
Pressure: Text messages sent between News Corp lobbyist Frederic Michel, left, and Jeremy Hunt have heaped pressure on to Mr Cameron to launch an inquiry
âThe evidence will be there for all to see whether Jeremy can stay in his job or not. We havenât been reluctant to look at the Ministerial Code because we are scared of anything. Our logic is that all will be outed in the inquiry.â
Mr Hunt had been expected to give evidence in around four weeksâ time. A spokesman for the inquiry was quoted as saying Mr Cleggâs suggestion that Mr Hunt would appear before then was âinaccurateâ.
Mr Hunt denies acting improperly.
But Labour leader Ed Miliband said: âPeople watching this Prime Ministerâs actions will conclude he has a great deal to hide and that his real fear is that Jeremy Huntâs resignation will put his own actions and behaviour centre stage.â
A spokesman for the Deputy Prime Minister said Mr Clegg had not intended to suggest that agreement had been reached with Lord Leveson on an early appearance for the Culture Secretary.â
- Egypt's 'plans for farewell intercourse law so husbands can...
- Giant cannibal shrimp more than a FOOT long invade waters...
- Dentist pulled out ALL boyfriend's teeth after he dumped her...
- Never-before-seen photos from 100 years ago tell vivid story...
- Model, nurse, cheerleader, churchgoer: Stunning wife of...
- Married Secret Service agent who 'refused to pay Colombian...
- Married school principal quits after student secretly films...
- Vintage vixen: Topless photos of Marilyn Monroe at last-ever...
- Judge awards $5.8 MILLION to woman who danced for Girls Gone...
- 'What took you so long?': What drug-addict mother, 34, said...
- Survivalist 'shoots himself dead' in bunker after SWAT teams...
- 'Everything I've done in my life will benefit him': How...
Share this article:
Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have been moderated in advance.
- Newest
- Oldest
- Best rated
- Worst rated
What are the Conservatives hiding? What did they do? And Why are they doing it? I predict we will find out in the media in due course....
Report abuse
"Lib Dem deputy leader Simon Hughes said: âWhat I cannot understand is why the matter of the ministerial code of conduct, which is to do with, âDo you take responsibility for your special adviser?â, is not something the Prime Minister should immediately refer to the person who has been given the job of doing that, Sir Alex Allan.â" It's what's called covering your backside!!! Cameron is determined to camouflage the real problem that Hunt IS responsible for his own department and nobody else!!!!!!
Report abuse
If he has done absolutely nothing wrong, then what does he have to fear from Sir Alex Allan's inquiry? The longer he puts off an investigation, the more likely it is that he will be forced into resignation.
Report abuse
GET HIM OUT NOW
Report abuse
Don't think he will be having a very happy weekend !
Report abuse
He is either incompetent for not knowing what his special advisor is doing in his name, or implicit in what his special advisor was doing. Jeremy Hunt should just go, and restore some honour to the noble offices of the government and to Parliament.
Report abuse
Correct decision!.........and the Permanent Secretary (after his obstructive appearance at the select committee) should clear his desk. Cameron is a lightweight bereft of ideas, and simply there because his 'gang' were in the right place at the right time........2 years wasted!
Report abuse
For goodness sake, why doesn't Hunt have the sense and dignity to go now? His conduct was dreadful and we really cannot have a minister acting in such a flagrantly biased way.
Report abuse
Come on Cameron it's your job to control your ministers not Lord Levenson. Just grow a pair and make some decisions that maybe the old boys club will not like but need to be done. You and Clegg need to stop acting like 2 little boys in a sweet shop and start GOVERNING YOUR GOVERNMENT.
Report abuse
Why is Cameron paying Sir Alex Allen £30,000 a year to investigate Ministers? He should have been called in to judge Liam Fox, and Theresa May. the problem is that he can only be called by the Prime Minister which is ridiculous. In the same way Lord Leveson will report to Jeremy Hunt. If Jeremy Hunt has broken Ministerial Rules we need to know urgently not in October if Jeremy Hunt decides to publish his own interrogation. Cameron is just bottling out for fear of what an Inquiry will produce.
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar