Jumat, 27 April 2012

Sharon, Christie and Michelle, the flawless 50s defy age this week

Sharon, Christie and Michelle, the flawless 50s defy age this week

By Simon Neville

|


They have a combined age of 165. But they don’t look a day over 100 between them.

Sharon Stone, Christie  Brinkley and Michelle Pfeiffer all seemed to defy age this week â€" again.

Miss Stone, 54 and twice divorced, sparkled in a canary yellow pleated skirt and matching sequined top at an event in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Sharon Stone Michelle Pfeiffer

Beaming vs vampish: A sunny Sharon Stone, 58, in Brazil, right, while Michelle Pfeiffer casts a sultry glance at a film industry event in Las Vegas, Nevada

Former model Miss Brinkley is the oldest of the trio, but arguably looks the youngest.

The 58-year-old is appearing in Chicago on Broadway in New York, where she was pictured looking almost Barbie doll-like in a white dress, matching pointed shoes and a grey coat and hat.

Her effervescent look is all the more startling given the stress she has been under fighting a lawsuit with fourth former husband Peter Cook.

He has described her as a ‘narcissistic egomaniac’.

The pair divorced in 2008 after he admitted sleeping with their neighbour’s teenage daughter.

What a doll: Christie Brinkley emerges from the stage door at a theatre in New York, where she appearing in Chicago on Broadway

What a doll: Christie Brinkley emerges from the stage door at a theatre in New York, where she appearing in Chicago on Broadway

In contrast, Miss Pfeiffer, 53, is still happily married to her second husband, television writer David E Kelley.

At a film industry event in Las Vegas, she looked vampish in a simple black skirt and black top.

And it seems she plans on maintaining her youthful looks for many years to come, having recently admitted that she would be perfectly willing to have a facelift.

Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

They look great and young, like women in their 30s, Christie looks like a 20 yo!!!! However, I don't understand why the DM adds up their ages, "a combined age of 165"? W..T...F?!

puh-Leeze!! All three of these women are botox'ed, highlighted, and under the knife. That's not beauty, that's just doctors and chemicals.

Sharon and Michelle look pretty natural - and good too, I doubt either have gone under the knife. Christie looks like she's probably had her face hoisted up and stapled to the top of her head, quite a caricature of herself. All a bit weird, so I'm just going to keep on with the moisturizers and serums which seem to be working on me so I'm happy.

I know they have all had work done, but it's very subtle they look great.

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar