Kamis, 26 April 2012

Layers of rock reveals that the ancient Earth was 'pummelled' by asteroids

Layers of rock reveals that the ancient Earth was 'pummelled' by asteroids

  • Findings from analysis of tiny 'spherules' in present-day rocks
  • Rocks from asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter four billion years ago
  • Bombardment lasted up to two times as long as previously thought

By Rob Waugh

|

Between three and four billion years ago, changes in an asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter hurled a devastating barrage of space rocks at our planet.

Astronomers are only now beginning to understand the scale of the bombardment - analysing the impacts from tiny 'spherules' preserved in rocks today.

Some of the asteroids were bigger than the 9-mile rock that wiped out the dinosaurs - but the 700-million-year barrage may have delivered chemicals crucial to the beginnings of life on our planet.

Astronomers are only now beginning to understand the scale of the bombardment - analysing the regularity and size of the impacts from tiny 'spherules' preserved in rocks today

Astronomers are only now beginning to understand the scale of the bombardment - analysing the regularity and size of the impacts from tiny 'spherules' preserved in rocks today


Researchers are learning details about asteroid impacts going back to the Earth's early history by using a new method for extracting precise information from tiny 'spherules' embedded in layers of rock

Researchers are learning details about asteroid impacts going back to the Earth's early history by using a new method for extracting precise information from tiny 'spherules' embedded in layers of rock

‘What we have done is provide the foundation for understanding how to interpret the layers in terms of the size and velocity of the asteroid that made them,’ said Jay Melosh, professor of earth and atmospheric sciences, physics and aerospace engineering at Purdue University.

'This is the first real solid evidence that this asteroid bombardment actually happened,’ Melosh said. ‘Some of the asteroids that we infer were about 25 miles in diameter, much larger than the one that killed off the dinosaurs about 65 million years ago.

But Melosh and his team believe that the bombardment may have delivered chemicals crucial to the evolution of life on our planet.

The study also seems to show that the bombardment lasted far longer than previous estimates, which suggested the 'Late Heavy Bombardment' lasted roughly half as long as Melosh's team estimates.

'But when we looked at the number of impactors as a function of size, we got a curve that showed a lot more small objects than large ones, a pattern that matches exactly the distribution of sizes in the asteroid belt. For the first time we have a direct connection between the crater size distribution on the ancient Earth and the sizes of asteroids out in space.’

Melosh and his team use 'spherules' - tiny markings in rocks - to work out the scale of the asteroid bombardment.

The spherules were created when asteroids crashed into the Earth, vaporizing rock that expanded into space as a giant vapor plume.

Small droplets of molten and vaporized rock in the plume condensed and solidified, falling back to Earth as a thin layer.

The round or oblong particles were preserved in layers of rock, and now researchers have analyzed them to record precise information about asteroids impacting Earth from 3.5 billion to 35 million years ago.

The period of heavy asteroid bombardment - from 4.2 to 3.5 billion years ago - is thought to have been influenced by changes in the early solar system that altered the trajectory of objects in an asteroid belt located between Mars and Jupiter, sending them on a collision course with Earth.

Meteor Crater in Northern Arizona

Meteor Crater in Northern Arizona: Some of the asteroids were bigger than the 9-mile rock that wiped out the dinosaurs - but the barrage continued for up to 700 million years, as an entire asteroid belt 'emptied' itself at our planet
Because craters are difficult to study directly, impact history must be inferred either by observations of asteroids that periodically pass near the Earth or by studying craters on the moon.

Now, the new technique using spherules offers a far more accurate alternative to chronicle asteroid impacts on Earth, Melosh said.

‘We can look at these spherules, see how thick the layer is, how big the spherules are, and we can infer the size and velocity of the asteroid,’ Melosh said. ‘We can go back to the earliest era in the history of the Earth and infer the population of asteroids impacting the planet.’

For asteroids larger than about 10 kilometers in diameter, the spherules are deposited in a global layer.

‘Some of these impacts were several times larger than the Chicxulub impact that killed off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago,’ Johnson said. ‘The impacts may have played a large role in the history of life. The large number of impacts may have helped simple life by introducing organics and other important materials at a time when life on Earth was just taking hold.’

A 40-kilometer asteroid would have wiped out everything on the Earth's surface, whereas the one that struck 65 million years ago killed only land animals weighing more than around 20 kilograms.

‘Impact craters are the most obvious indication of asteroid impacts, but craters on Earth are quickly obscured or destroyed by surface weathering and tectonic processes,’ Johnson said. ‘Howeve r, the spherule layers, if preserved in the geologic record, provide information about an impact even when the source crater cannot be found.’

The Purdue researchers studied the spherules using computer models that harness mathematical equations developed originally to calculate the condensation of vapor.

‘There have been some new wrinkles in vapor condensation modeling that motivated us to do this work, and we were the first to apply it to asteroid impacts,’ Melosh said.

The spherules are about a millimeter in diameter.

The researchers also are studying a different type of artifact similar to spherules but found only near the original impact site. Whereas the globally distributed spherules come from the condensing vaporized rock, these ‘melt droplets’ are from rock that's been melted and not completely vaporized.

‘Before this work, it was not possible to distinguish between these two types of formations ,’ Melosh said. ‘Nobody had established criteria for discriminating between them, and we've done that now.’

One of the authors of the Southwest Research Institute paper, David Minton, is now an assistant professor of earth and atmospheric sciences at Purdue.

Findings from the research may enable Melosh's team to enhance an asteroid impact effects calculator he developed to estimate what would happen if asteroids of various sizes were to hit the Earth. The calculator, ‘Impact: Earth!’ allows anyone to calculate potential comet or asteroid damage based on the object's mass.

Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

It really should be no surprise that a major catastrophe had engulfed our World in prehistoric time - before thinking man ever walked its green fields--upright: The Moon reflects it every day and night. ~~~ And, again we see with wearisome regularity, this logic-defying concept emerge, that destruction can generate order and life--given inexplicable, chain-reactions, formations, and hypothetical transformations. Hammer blows inducing, not a chemical-like BREAKDOWN process, over time, but, a BUILD-UP process in time. Abstracted in real-World sunlight, how much sense does that mindset of system-creation and organization really make? It is only though intelligent man--and his skilled hands--that a creation can build-up from nothing (given laws, materials, etc.): experiment, improve, modify, rework, advance -- and eventually perfect. But it will always be under purposeful direction from visionary concept. Whether its a simple little garden tool, or an orbi ting Space Station.

this has been common knowledge for decades - try harder DM!

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar