Kamis, 03 Mei 2012

Bird flu: Science journal publishes details of deadly virus that 'could cause global pandemic'

Bird flu: Science journal publishes details of deadly virus that 'could cause global pandemic'


  • Scientists argue publication will help find cure
  • Mutant lab-created version can be spread easily among ferrets
  • Not clear whether 'new' versions of flu would have same effect in humans

By Rob Waugh

|

Mexican health officials deal with bird flu: The virus sparked fears among U.S. biosecurity experts that it could be used as a recipe for a bioterrorist attack

Mexican health officials deal with bird flu: The virus sparked fears among U.S. biosecurity experts that it could be used as a recipe for a bioterrorist attack

The science journal Nature has published the first of two controversial papers about laboratory-enhanced versions of the deadly bird flu virus - described by some as a 'recipe' for a bioterror attack.

The virus sparked fears among U.S. biosecurity experts that it could be used as a recipe for a bioterrorist attack.

Bird flu is lethal in humans, but in its natural form, is unable to be spread from person to person by coughing or sneezing.

The publication of the paper by Yoshihiro Kawaoka of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, on Wednesday follows months of debate.

Experts battled over the need for science to be free of censorship against the obligation to protect the public from a potentially devastating flu pandemic.   

Bird flu is lethal in people and spreads among those who are in close contact with infected birds, but so far, the virus known as H5N1 has not had the ability to pass easily among humans through sneezing and coughing, and some scientists had begun to doubt that that was possible.   

The studies by Kawaoka and Dr. Ron Fouchier of Erasmus Medical College in the Netherlands changed that view by proving that with a few genetic mutations, the virus could pass easily among ferrets, which are used as a close approximation of how a virus might behave in people.  


‘There are people who say that bird flu has been around for 16, 17 years and never attained human transmissibility and never will,’ said Malik Peiris, virology professor at the University of Hong Kong.    

‘What this paper shows is that it certainly can. That is an important public health message, we have to take H5N1 seriously. It doesn't mean it will become a pandemic, but it can,’ said Peiris, who wrote a commentary accompanying Kawaoka's paper in Nature.   

A Pakistani health official removes chickens from an infected farm, Gadap, Pakistan; 'We have to take H5N1 seriously. It doesn't mean it will become a pandemic, but it can,¿ said Peiris, who wrote a commentary accompanying Kawaoka's paper in Nature

A Pakistani health official removes chickens from an infected farm, Gadap, Pakistan; 'We have to take H5N1 seriously. It doesn't mean it will become a pandemic, but it can,¿ said Peiris, who wrote a commentary accompanying Kawaoka's paper in Nature

The impending publication of the two papers last December prompted the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity to recommend that sensitive information be redacted, a first for the group which was formed after a series of anthrax attacks in the United States in 2001.

The group advises the Department of Health and Human Services and other agencies about ‘dual use’ research that could serve public health but also be a potential bioterrorism threat.    

The biosecurity panel spent two days earlier this year considering the papers.

Deadly: The natural form of H5N1 has infected tens of millions of birds

Deadly: The natural form of H5N1 has infected tens of millions of birds

Both papers describe how scientists altered several genes of natural, or wild-type, H5N1 in a way that allowed it to spread from the airways of infected ferrets to other ferrets caged nearby.

So far, the natural form of H5N1 has infected tens of millions of ducks, geese, chickens, and other birds. But the only people to be infected - 598, of whom 353 have died - were those who came into close contact with the flocks.

The board was persuaded by an additional benefit of publishing the research - by informing countries where H5N1 is endemic, it would allow scientists there to be on the lookout for the mutations that make the virus more transmissible.

The National Institutes of Health, which funded some of the research, agreed with the panel's assessment and made non-binding recommendations to Nature and Science, the journal that planned to publish Fouchier's study, to withhold key elements of the work.   

But after a series of meetings involving flu experts and officials at the World Health Organization and the National Institutes of Health in the United States, the NSABB reversed its decision.    

Green light: Papers on the H5N1 avian flu virus will be published in Nature and Science this year

Green light: Papers on the H5N1 avian flu virus will be published in Nature and Science this year

The group voted unanimously to support publication of the paper by Kawaoka, considered the least controversial of the two.   

And it voted 12-6 in favor of publishing a study from Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands, but did not explain the concerns among some panel members about that research. Science has not given a specific date for its publication.   

Kawaoka said in an email he believed that in face-to-face meetings with members of the NSABB in March, he was able to explain in greater detail the full implications of his experiments and win the panel's support.   

Kawaoka's team developed a hybrid virus by taking the hemagglutinin gene from the H5N1 virus and combining it with the pandemic strain of the 2009 H1N1 swine flu virus.   

Then, by adding four other gene mutations, plus some spontaneous changes that occurred in the ferrets, the virus became transmissible among ferrets - the best model scientists have for predicting whether a flu virus can be transmitted among humans, Peiris said.   

‘But it doesn't necessarily mean that just because this virus transmitted in ferrets, it will 100 percent transmit in humans, but it's as close as we can get. It lost a lot of its virulence in ferrets, maybe because of the H1N1 backbone,’ Peiris said.   

Kawaoka said his manuscript has been updated to provide more information about the benefits of these findings, particularly the risk posed by currently circulating viruses that already have one of these mutati ons.

‘In addition, we provided more details about the biosafety and biosecurity measures in place to conduct these experiments,’ Kawaoka said.    

Arturo Casadevall, a microbiologist from Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York and a member of NSABB, said from his own perspective, he still believes there is risk in publishing information on how to increase the transmissibility of the bird flu virus, but publishing the study also gives scientists around the world a better idea of what to watch for in viruses already circulating.   

Knowing that bird flu has the potential to jump more easily from human to human may now encourage governments to do a better job of tracking this potential threat.   

‘We feel the risk is still there, but the benefits now outweigh the risks,’ he said.   

Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.

The comments below have not been moderated.

Poor ferrets.

Genetically modified crops are sprayed with a pesticide made by a company for product. Will genetically modified virus be treated with a vaccine made by companies for profit?

Think about it. Better to share knowledge so that others can develop antidotes and vaccines. - Richard, Cheltenham, 03/5/2012 17:10

Which do you think will happen faster? Somebody with no government or big pharma backing is going to develop a vaccine, or someone will create and release the virus?

Considering the whole point of this virus is that it's nearly impossible to cure, my money is on the virus being released first.

Think about it, is that really your idea of "better"?

The New World Order's weapon of choice.

I am sure that scientists in North Korea and Iran will be avidly reading their copies of Nature this month.

Think about it. Better to share knowledge so that others can develop antidotes and vaccines. Or would you rather it was only known to governments and shared through spy and espionage networks, all kept secret from the likes of you and me? The spirit of science is essentially one of collaboration and public knowledge. .. I prefer open shared knowledge, good or bad: if not, who decides what we should know and what we shouldn't?

My jimmies have already been rustled enough today and now you spring this on us, were doomed WERE ALL DOOOOOMED!!!!!!

Oh lovely what bright spark scientist decide realise this virus.....Were doomed were all doomed!!!!!!!!!wonder if i get that tattoo on my arm 666 will that save me??

I read this a few years ago and thought the author must be mad.....They have been culling populations for years, using eugenics, they have dumbed us down with drivel media, they spy on us daily through media etc they must wipe out any faith you have in God, then those that really control the economies and banks and the media, will ultimately control the world...... Now I'm starting to consider maybe not do mad after all.

Well done you so called "experts". Maybe think about what you're saying next time?

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar