By Tony Rennell
|
She lay in her bed, sick from diphtheria, restless and raving with a high fever.
Henry Robinson peered at his wife Isabella and then bent his head closer to try to decipher her delirious mutterings. He caught the gasped-out names ofâ.â.â.âmen!
The stiff-necked, beak-nosed Victorian patriarch was aghast. He had suspected her of infidelity â" a terrible affront to Robinson even though he quite openly had a mistress and two illegitimate children.

Passion: The Victorians preferred classical allusions to sex. Isabella Robinson's florid descriptions of her desperate emotional, intellectual and physical desire for a man not her husband shocked the time
Now he would find out the truth.
He went to her desk â" unlocked, for once â" took out the red-backed private diaries he knew she kept hidden away there and began to leaf through them.
What came tumbling out that day in the spring of 1856 were her graphic confessions of dread, contempt and disgust â" which cannot have been a complete surprise, because their 12-year marriage had been a disaster from day one.
But what sent him into a rage were Isabellaâs florid descriptions of her desperate emotional, intellectual and physical â" yes, physical â" ache for a doctor friend, Edward Lane.
In page after page she poured out admissions not only of her all-consuming desire for the doctor but how, in the end, seemingly she had had her way.
âI leaned back at last in silent joy,â her husband read, âin those arms I had so often dreamed of and kissed the curls and smooth face, so radiant with beauty, that had dazzled my outward and inward vision since I first saw him.â
Robinson confiscated his wifeâs journals, along with hundreds of other letters, essays, notes and poems of hers, took custody of their two children and turfed her out.
The scene was set for a scandal â" played out in the newly constituted divorce courts â" that rocked Victorian Englandâs treasured image of blissful family life and a wifeâs happy, subservient role in it.
Observers asked themselves how such a well-brought-up, middle-class lady could have had such lustful thoughts and dreams, let alone acted on them?
Her aroused libido was not only an affront to God in his heaven but seemed to undermine the very foundations of society.
Men in high places quivered with anger and anxiety, and the judges even ordered female spectators out of the Westminster Hall courtroom for fear of corrupting their morals, so salacious and inflammatory was some of the evidence thought to be.
This now largely forgotten case comes back to life in a new book by Kate Summerscale, author of the highly acclaimed, best-selling and prize-winning The Suspicions Of Mr Whicher.

What exactly was going on beneath the starched petticoats and buttoned-up bodices of our great-great-great grandmothers?
With Mrs Robinsonâs Disgrace, she shifts her forensic eye from a celebrated Victorian murder to the secrets and lies of a monstrous Victorian marriage.
It is an intriguing story that challenges the conventional view of respectable English society in the 19th century.
What exactly was going on beneath the starched petticoats and buttoned-up bodices of our great-great-great grandmothers? Much much more, it turns out, than we can ever have suspected.
The case was a complex one, mired in claim and counter-claim, but one fact was largely unquestioned â" that Henry Robinson was a rotten husband.
Obnoxious, sullen, selfish, uneducated and rude, he married Isabella â" a thirtysomething widow with a son â" for her inherited money, which he then purloined for his own purposes, though he was a wealthy man in his own right.
He ran a thriving business building steam boats and sugar mills, which took him away from home frequently.
This left her feeling abandoned and lonely in a loveless marriage, but also relieved to be without the brute. In his absence, she had time and opportunity for finer things â" literature, poetry, philosophy, science, religion.
And love. And passion. And the search for happiness and fulfilment.
Her wistful, wandering eye fell on a winsome tutor employed for her sons. In her diary she recorded her âunutterable yearningâ for his company. They talked of sculpture and painting. She gave him money and gifts.
He âclings to my heartstringsâ, she confided, and wrote of âan encounterâ â" details unexplained â" beneath a tree in the garden.
But the real target of her passion was Edward Lane, 27 years old and everything her detested husband was not â" âfascinatingâ, âgracefulâ, âhandsomeâ, âlivelyâ, âcharmingâ and âgood-humouredâ, she wrote in her journal.
That Lane was also married, with an adoring wife (the sister of his best friend) and a large brood of children, she chose to ignore.
His was an engaging circle of close-knit family and clever literary and academic friends â" an intellectual elite who met in each otherâs homes to discuss Goethe and Shelley, wrote articles for learned magazines and were au fait with all the latest scientific and philosophical notions.
They swept Isabella up and along, and she loved it. In the ir company she came alive, proving every bit as witty and merry, clear-thinking and engaged as she yearned to be.
But it was Lane she could not get out of her head, his body every bit as much as his mind.

Victorian England's had a treasured image of blissful family life and a wife's happy, subservient role in it
In her diary she noted her every conversation with him: the subject matter, the thread of the argument, but, more importantly for her, the turn of his head and the way he seemed secretly to glance at her.
Alone in bed at night (she and her husband had separate rooms), her erotic imagination ran riot. She tossed and turned, âDreaming all night of romantic situations and Mr Laneâ.
The downside was the loss she felt without him. If he was slow to reply to a letter, her heart was filled âwith unspeakable sadnessâ.
She saw signs that her feelings might be reciprocated when, at a musical soiree, she requested him pointedly to sing âOh the heart is a free and fetterless thingâ.
He obliged and she was filled with joy. She wanted more.
Lane, a gentleman doctor who believed in natural remedies, ran a successful health clinic he had set up in a country house in Surrey, specialising in the calming effects of wat er-therapy.
Victorian hydrotherapists used water in many forms, taken internally or perhaps in baths, to relieve their patientsâ symptoms.
Overwrought Victorians flocked to Lane to relieve their anxieties.
A tense Charles Darwin, in agony from flatulence, headaches, eczema and boils brought on by writing On The Origin of Species, was one who took the cure.
Isabella, who lived 20 miles away, became a guest too, and it was there that â" according to her diaries â" the object of her lust succumbed.
Lane invited her for a walk in the surrounding countryside and, among the heather âin a glade of surpassing beautyâ, he kissed her.
âI made no opposition,â she brazenly admitted, âfor had I not dreamed of him and of this full many a time before? What followed I hardly remember â" passionate kisses, whispered words, confessions of the past.
âOh, God! I had never hoped to see this hour, o r to have my part of love returned. But so it was.â
There was more to come. Back at the house, they slipped away from his wife after tea and renewed their âpassionate excitementâ in his study.
âBliss,â she recorded â" a word that would later come under microscopic examination for its precise meaning â" âpredominatedâ.
Whatever they were up to, they were at it again the next day. Another country walk a deux ended with them resting âamong the dry fernâ and Isabellaâs coy but highly suggestive entry in her diary: âI shall not state what followed.â
Then, alone in the back of a carriage for an hour as he accompanied her to the railway station at the end of her stay, there was more intriguing âblissâ â" âsuch that I could willingly have died not to wake out of it againâ.
On her next visit to the clinic she was, not surprisingly, expecting more of the same, but she was in for disappointment. Lane was off-hand with her and she was âcrushed in spiritâ.
But, reluctantly, he managed a quarter of an hour of âblissful excitementâ with her behind the closed door of his study, leaving Isabella ânearly helplessâ with pleasure.
The next day, though, he took her aside and told her he was no longer prepared to risk his reputation and his marriage. Their relationship was over.
A devastated Isabella grasped the sad and depressing truth â" âthat though I might have caused momentary passion, I was not wholly belovedâ.
For all her desperate longing for Laneâs love and an escape from the loneliness of her marriage to a new life, she had been just a fling, a bit on the side, the fall girl in a romantic melodrama.
Reading all this, her husband was bent on revenge and, in court, where he sued her for divorce and named Lane as co-respondent, produced the diaries as clear evidence of adultery.
The lascivious outpourings of his frustrated wife were revealed to a startled public for whom sex was a largely unspoken subject, forbidden fruit.
Here, in real life, was the sort of depravity only ever depicted in risque French novels.
Victorian society raised its eyebrows in horror while revelling in every prurient detail it could get its hands on.
As for the outcome, it seemed Henry Robinson could not lose.
For a start, the divorce law was heavily weighted in favour of men and against wayward wives â" his own sexual misdemeanours, for example, went unmentioned.
With Isabella condemned by her own words as guilty of adultery, it was surely an open-and-shut case. With a verdict in his favour, Robinson hoped he might hang on to some of her wealth and leave her destitute, an idea he found most appealing.
Unlessâ.â.â.âeverything she had written was fantasy and fiction, nothing more than the del usions of a silly woman.
Which was now the position taken by Edward Lane, the person with the most to lose in this increasingly sordid affair. If adultery was proved against him, his lucrative medical practice would be wrecked, along with his marriage and his social position. Indignantly, he denied everything.
Mrs Robinson had been a friend â" no more.
He had never encouraged her, never made advances, never kissed her or had physical relations.
She was âa rhapsodical and vaporing foolâ, he declared, âa vile and crazy womanâ given to âmoonshine lucubrationsâ. She had made the whole thing up.

Mrs Robinson's Disgrace is Kate Summerscale's latest book
Isabellaâs lawyer took the same line. The diaries werenât factual but âthe product of extravagance and excitementâ bordering on madness, and he brought in expert medical witnesses to swear she was deranged.
The word ânymphomaniaâ was used, a result of unspecified âuterine diseaseâ â" womenâs problems.
In other words, if a woman liked sex, thought about sex, dreamed about sex and set about getting sex, she had to be ill or mad or both.
One doctor advised the court that Isabella had probably written the erotic scenes simply to arouse herself; pieces of personal pornography for her own onanistic pleasure, which, in turn, had contributed to her insanity.
There was even a suggestion that the solitary pleasures of reading and writing were highly dangerous for some women.
Isabella chose to go along with this defence â" probably out of guilt (or love) for Lane. Yes, sheâd made it all up, she admit ted in a letter to his family. He was above reproach, had never laid a finger on her.
The diaries were her imagination running out of control, they had been for her own eyes only and the real villain of the piece was her husband, first for having invaded her privacy by reading them and then putting them in the public domain.
With difficult issues to resolve, the judges took three months to come to a decision, and in the end they came up with a surprising and subtle verdict.
They didnât consider Isabella was insane and they thought her diaries had the ring of truth about them. They might in places be exaggerated and melodramatic, but they werenât entirely delusional.
But the legal problem was that, though her writings hinted at acts of adultery with words such as âblissâ, such incoherence fell short of a confession that she and Lane had actually gone the whole way.
The judges were pretty sure somethin g naughty had occurred between the pair, but could not be sure precisely what. There was no conclusive proof of adultery and, on that ground, Henry Robinsonâs petition for divorce against his wife was rejected.
On a technicality, Lane was off the hook. He went back to his family and his clinic and got on with his life unaffected.
âI am glad to say that not one of Dr Laneâs patients has given him up,â noted Charles Darwin.
By that same technicality, Isabella and Henry Robinson â" as ill-matched a couple as it is possible to imagine â" remained man and wife, though legally separated.
He railed against the courtâs decision, which left him humiliated and out of pocket.
She, though disgraced and an outcast, was glad to have gained a victory of some sort over her repulsive and domineering husband.
In her diary she had poignantly written: âI find it impossible to love where I ought or keep from loving where I ought not.â
Now, at least, she was as free as any Victorian woman would ever be to do as she pleased.
Mrs Robinsonâs Disgrace: The Private Diary Of A Victorian Lady by Kate Summerscale, is published by Bloomsbury at £16.99. To order a copy for £14.99 (including pp) call 0843 382 0000.
Â
-
Covered in her boyfriend's blood: Woman pictured minutes... -
Why man's best friend is also his worst photobomber:... -
John Travolta was BANNED from top New York hotel spa for... -
Frozen in the sands of time: Eerie Second World War plane... -
Just the ticket for popping the question: The tree-lined... -
Princes William and Harry enjoy the glorious weather by... -
Tragedy of hero Marine who pulled his college friend from... -
Americans consume EIGHTY percent of the world's pain pills... -
'There was a wonder as Papa was crowned': What Princess... -
A barrel of laughs: The weird and wacky pub signs that will... -
Great, great, great grandma to celebrate Mothers' Day in... -
Empire Strikes Backstage: Intimate pictures of cast and crew...
Share this article:
Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have not been moderated.
- Newest
- Oldest
- Best rated
- Worst rated
Patoise - why would you write that on a story about an English woman being anything but frigid even when society forbade it?! What an unintelligent and ill-formed opinion.
Report abuse
Why, if she was financially independent in the first place, did she agree to marry a man both ugly and brutish; doesn't make sense !. - Charlotte, London, 13/5/2012 9:58 ...Are there are other kinds?
Report abuse
Why, if she was financially independent in the first place, did she agree to marry a man both ugly and brutish; doesn't make sense !.
Report abuse
All women love sex , with a great lover not someone who only wants to please himself while she's staring at the ceiling waiting for the 'duty' to be over.
Report abuse
Original transcript from her lover doctor ; ' I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN '
Report abuse
Is this really worth reading? I do believe that sex has been around FORVEVER, and it's never been the exclusive milieu of men. So a woman in the 1800's wanted it. I'll bet you a £1m woman from every era have wanted it, too. Every generation thinks they invented it. If the story is about how a divorce ensued, well, the current generation didn't invent that either.
Report abuse
Well, I've had several experiences with females, of several nationalities, which was like necrophilia with a warm one! But, I have had exciting sex with others of those same nationalities......... I have to admit, I have never had sex with a "Française".... I prefer to do it than talk about it!
Report abuse
Where would we be without sex? Not writing in this place for one thing! LOL.
Report abuse
...."the judges took three months to come to a decision".....sure he read her diary in his "private room" every day for three months, and probably had his own "bliss". lol :):):)
Report abuse
I wouldn't rush to get this book. The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher was total dreck.
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar