Our last Wimbledon winner unleashes a devastating volley guaranteed to court controversy in the female locker rooms
By Virginia Wade
|

Virginia Wade pictured holding up her Wimbledon trophy after winning the tournament in 1977
It was a day Iâll never forget: July 1, 1977. The year of the Silver Jubilee â" and the day I won Wimbledon. Nothing could have prepared me for the euphoria of claiming the title.
My single greatest regret is not realising quite what a momentous time it really was. The crowd was electric and, with their terrific support behind each swing, I beat Dutch player Betty Stove.
Not only was I the first female British tennis player in eight years to win Wimbledon (since Ann Jones in 1969), but I was also part of an exciting generation of women tennis players who were never fully appreciated at the time.
These women not only played interesting games but they had interesting things to say off court.
It was a time when fierce personal rivalries and big personalities dominated the courts, games were charged with electricity and fans were hooked.
And even though there is still huge interest in tennis today, what a difference there is on the womenâs courts.
Weâre lucky if our women players say anything illuminating, just a grunt while hitting the ball.
Their personalities are reined in by mollycoddling entourages. Whatâs left are muscular powerhouses, bred to slam balls between baselines with all the power they can muster.
Theyâre taught to treat tennis parties like business meetings. Their personalities are probably interesting underneath, but to spectators theyâre racket-wielding robots.
No wonder womenâs tennis has become somewhat predictable.

Virginia Wade attacks players like Serena Williams and her sister Venus for transforming the sport into a competition about physical strength
There are two reasons for this.
Firstly, the games have become far less interesting to watch.
But, secondly and more importantly, womenâs tennis lacks personality â" which makes the players seem dull and disappointing.
The problem of the games becoming less interesting to watch began during the mid-Nineties, when the enormously talented Williams sisters, Venus and Serena, raised the power bar.
They are so physically strong that many other girls felt the only way to beat them was to be just as forceful.
From a multi-layered game of technical prowess, mental agility and power, womenâs tennis became a muscle match. Endless balls are now smacked from baseline to baseline using brute strength.
Take Belarusian tennis star Victoria Azarenka, the current world Noââ1. Even during the off-season, she spends two hours in the gym each day followed by a rigorous regime of hill sprints.

Virginia Wade pictured here in 2010, says today's female tennis stars lack the personality of previous generations
Enthralling as Serena and Venus Williamsâs matches were ten years ago, the repetitiveness of power tennis has become dull.
Yet this is only half of the story. Power tennis could be enthralling if we really knew and cared about the players.
Nowhere is this clearer than at the French Open, which finishes today.
There have been fabulous matches, but no matter how astonishing the encounter between top seed Azarenka and Slovakian underdog Dominika Cibulkova â" who knocked her out of the tournament in the fourth round â" few people knew enough about these talented young women to really care.

Anna Kournikova is more famous for her modelling and dating Enrique Iglesias than her game
To catch our attention, we need their personalities to shine too. It doesnât matter whether they are shy or talkative, as long as they have something interesting to say â" or an intense dynamic to capture our attention.
No one could forget the colourful personality of Billie Jean King, who won 12 Grand Slams with her legendary right arm.
She was as memorable off court, campaigning for the equality of women in sport, as she was on it.
Or even more intriguing, the compelling rivalry between all-American, sunny Chris Evert and hard-muscled, emotionless Czechoslovakian Martina Navratilova, with foundations rooted in friendship.
On the court, their matches were unfailingly dramatic, the tension ramped up by cursing, slapped thighs and spontaneous bursts of tears.Â
But it was their unlikely friendship that captivated audiences.
It was even the subject of a stirring documentary called Unmatched, made two years ago by US TV network E SPN â" decades after they retired, their complex relationship still gripped the American nation.
Steffi Graf and Monica Seles grabbed the attention of tennis fans with similar rivalry in the Nineties.
Relationships such as these are rare but, in my generation, everyone spent time together away from the games â" which added another dimension to the matches.
Today, Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer are both great rivals and respectful, but dynamics like this are difficult to forge, particularly among women.
Most live in cocooned worlds, surrounded by tight-knit entourages with little opportunity to mix with other players in the same way we did.
Parties and social events are few and far between, and any socialising that is permitted tends to revolve around these insular entourages.
Every calorie and hour is mapped out by their teams, leaving little room for the playerâs individuality to surface.
BUT PLAYERS LINE UP TO BACK SHARAPOVA AND HER RIVALS
Former British Noâ1 Jo Durie believes Virginia Wadeâs broadside on the current womenâs game is unjustified.
Miss Durie, 51, who starred in the mid-Eighties, said: âVirginiaâs criticism would have been appropriate about a year ago, but recently I think the gameâs got a bit more interesting.
âVictoria Azarenka and Maria Sharapova met in the final of the Porsche Tennis GP in Stuttgart recently â" and the shoulder bump and looks they gave each other at changeovers were marvellous.
It was real rivalry and back to the old days.â
And Jeremy Bates, 49, former British menâs Noâ1 and current coach to Britainâs womenâs Noâ1, Anne Keothavong, added: âWith the greatest respect to Virginia for what she has achieved, I think itâs completely unnecessary for former players to criticise the current crop.
âItâs a business n owadays and some players need a large support team.
âAnd Maria Sharapova undoubtedly has an aura â" so does Serena Williams.â
However, John Lloyd, 57, another ex-British Noâ1, reckons Ms Wade is right.
âWhere are todayâs superstars?â he asked.
âThere are few in womenâs tennis â" and no rivalries for the public to care about.
âBritish fans used to look forward to Evertâs battles with Navratilova. Their rivalry was like a TV soap.â
When Martina Navratilova played during the Eighties, she brought a new level of fitness into womenâs tennis. Even male players took notice of her diet plan and fitness regime when she began to dominate the courts.
Ivan Lendl revised his own fitness regime, inspired by her. Yet thereâs no room for this sort of trailblazing today.
The crux of the problem, though, is advertising and marketing. This is the one way fans can really get to know p layers outside the tennis circuit.
Men seem to do tremendously well at this. Sport, unfortunately, is still a male domain so there are far more roles open to them, just as there are in Hollywood films.
Loath as I am to admit it, men are also infinitely better at networking and putting themselves across well during these appearances.
Women tend to be more conscious about their appearance, which can make them seem stiffer.
Add to this the fact that there are fewer campaigns for them and perhaps itâs not surprising we know them less.
Whatâs dangerous is the impact that this publicity can have on their game if mismanaged.
Put bluntly, for a male player to be offered a large campaign or photoshoot, he tends to be highly talented on court.
But for a female player to be awarded a campaign, she needs charisma and stunning looks.
Itâs not surprising, then, that the female players with t he right ingredients tend to be the youngest ones, many of whom are early in their careers and dangerously unprepared for the limelight.
Take Daniela Hantuchova, the former world Noââ5 who was taken by surprise when she found herself in the spotlight for her looks rather than her tennis.
Perhaps thatâs what made her concentration suffer and triggered her bad losing streak in 2003, just four years after she turned professional.
Anna Kournikova also managed to forge a successful career on her looks â" but achieved very little on the court.
Thatâs not to say that there arenât some exciting players today, there are â" Maria Sharapova, Sam Stosur and Sara Errani. Even so, they need more consistent success to really appeal to fans.
It could be that tennis changes in waves.
In the Eighties, womenâs tennis peaked with Evert and Navratilova on the courts.
And menâs tennis fell a littl e flat when Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi retired.
If thatâs the case, it could soon swing back the other way.
But thatâs little comfort to former female champions who feel that our legacy has been squandered.
To reincarnate that golden age, we need a new generation of ground-breaking players with substance â" women who will bring not only talent to the courts, but personality too.
-
Horror as two teenagers 'stab female pizza delivery worker... -
Pictured: Olympic star Dominique Moceanu's secret sister who... -
No, theyâre not photographs: Astonishing acrylic... -
Gasps of horror as jury is shown photos of woman's body... -
Gunmen on the run as two football players are shot dead 'in... -
Caught on camera: Polar bear shatters enclosure's glass in... -
And you thought it was bad now... Never-before-seen pictures... -
'There was nothing we could do': Hiker reveals photograph of... -
Legendary lost 'White City' of gold 'discovered' in dense... -
The hunt is still on: 50 years after three inmates 'escaped'... -
Man filmed whipping his son during game of catch arrested... -
Highway of Tears: Mystery of the 800-mile stretch of...
Share this article:
Here's what other readers have said. Why not add your thoughts, or debate this issue live on our message boards.
The comments below have not been moderated.
- Newest
- Oldest
- Best rated
- Worst rated
Sorry not old enough for that era
Report abuse
Apart from Serena Williams and Samantha Stosur you're not exactly gonna see a bunch of muscle bound women smashing the balls. The women aren't muscular they're athletic. Look at Sharapova who just completed her Career Grand Slam (something Virginia was unable to do). She's athletic not muscular, she wouldn't look out of place on a Victoria's Secret catwalk. I would say that the woman's game has moved on from being a leisurely game to a competitive sport. It's ludicrous to demand the women to not train and condition their bodies to be at their athletic best (something we expect the men to do). This is a stupid as complaining that the legs of the female Olympic sprinters are too muscular.
Report abuse
If the audience grunted everytime one of the grunters was about to hit the ball, all this nonsense would soon stop. - Ted, Wallingham, 10/6/2012 14:36 ........ well exactly Ted. Interesting that the spectators of matches are told by the umpire to be quiet just before a serve and yet the players are allowed to squeal grunt and bellow like banshees..... all very odd.
Report abuse
I can't abide the noises the women players make nowadays..in fact, I hate it and I can't watch them play anymore..please please those in charge make it against the rules..I don't buy the argument that they 'have' to do it because they are hitting the ball so hard..what a nonsense..these grunty show offs are a blight on a wonderful sport that has featured brilliant and classy women players for years.
Report abuse
Well Virginia I remember well the second rate player that you were. You only won Wimbledon because you had no opposition that year. Your personality was that of whining and excuses for being second rate. - Jean Fuller, Eastleigh Hants, 10/6/2012 10:18 well she managed to beat chris evert the number one seed and defending champion in the semis
Report abuse
Tracey, Here 10/06/2012 4:07 - You comments about football are right. I'm not a football fan, but I remember the 1990 world cup and how well our team played, fair enough they didn't win the world cup, but making it to the semi-finals was quite an achievement. Whereas England didn't even make it to the quarter finals two years ago. Although in 1990 footballers had celebrity status and were well-paid, it's was nothing like nowadays and back then they were still in it for the game and winning trophies and were more down-to-earth people.
Report abuse
Meow . . . !
Report abuse
Women's Tennis, in the 70s and 80s, used to be all about angles, manouvering your opponent around the court, we'd see volleys and lobs and an all court game. There were the classic battles between a baseliner and a serve-volleyer, it was always interesting. But for over a decade now it's just been bash the ball as hard as possible, from baseline to baseline, with 6ft plus women grunting. I find it tedious, and am no longer an avid fan. I don't know why they don't rope off the forecourt, as no woman ever uses it nowadays, unless they run forward to retrieve a drop shot, and they never use a slice shot anymore, especially the sliced return on grass, it's just bash bash bash. Yawn.
Report abuse
*manly
Report abuse
The slide began with the Williams sisters. Amazon women with no class, foul mouths and dress. I quit watching tennis after enjoying the sport for too many years to count. Sad.
Report abuse
The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar